I have this thing about Cuba. Positive, that is. I cheer for Cuba. My up-beat disposition is due in no small part to having been in Cuba the very week that Fidel Castro took Havana — December/January, 1958/59. For much of the time that I was there, we were in territories controlled by Mr. Castro. Since then I have had many occasions to defend Cuba against strong anti-Castro propaganda in the United States.
This week Cincinnati Reds fans are ecstatic about a new young pitcher, Aroldis Chapman, who defected from Cuba last year. His fast ball has been clocked at 105 mph. In his first game with the Reds, he struck out the first Brewer he faced, and did a quick 1-2-3 in the seventh inning. Last evening he was called in to pitch an inning and again retired the side 1-2-3. On the first night, an announcer said something like this: we just can’t imagine what it must be like, a lad knowing he has the skill to be a great pitcher, yet living in “abject poverty.”
I hope Chapman succeeds, but I object to this description of Cuba, a place of “abject poverty.” Abject, by the way, is used mainly when talking about poverty. We don’t say, for example, that a man suffered abject pain or that the day is abjectly hot, but we’ve learned to modify the word poverty with the adjective abject. In case you don’t know what abject means, the dictionary says “extremely bad, unpleasant, and degrading.”
So how bad off is Cuba. I consulted The World Fact Book and offer some statistics.
– The unemployment rate in Cuba is 1.7%; in the United Stataes, 9.3%.
– Infant mortality in Cuba is 5.82 deaths per 1,000 live births; in the United States 6.22.
– Life expectancy in Cuba is 77.45; in the United States 78.11.
– The literacy rate in Cuba is 99.8%; in the United States 99%.
– School life expectancy in Cuba is 15 for males, 17 for females; in the U.S. 15 for males, 16 for females.
I have been told repeatedly that if you want to find slums, don’t go to Cuba. Instead select U.S. city. Abject poverty.



















